Autonomous Language Learning When Language Is a Social Practice: Implications for Teacher Educators

Authors

  • Christian Faltis Stanford University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/vel.vi5.44

Keywords:

Autonomous language learning;, learning strategies;, self-regulation;, socio-cultural learning;, language practices

Abstract

This article presents a discussion of autonomous language learning within newer understandings of language and language development. After providing a brief literature review of what good language learners do and the onset of autonomous language learning in the 1980s, the article moves forward to
present-day understandings of language, and the role that autonomous language learning has within socio-cultural views of language. The article ends with implications for teacher educators who must prepare the next generation of language learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Christian Faltis, Stanford University

Christian Faltis is Professor of Language, Education, and Society and Chair of the Department of Teaching and Learning.  His research interests include teacher education for emergent bilingual users, bilingual and dual language education, and critical arts-based learning. 

Faltis has been a Fulbright Scholar.  He was the recipient of an AERA Distinguished Scholar Award in 2001. He was inducted as an AERA Fellow in 2016. Among his many publications are Preparing Teachers to Teach in and Advocate for Linguistically Diverse Classroom:  A Vade Mecum for Teacher Educators (2016) Secondary Bilingual Education: Cutting the Gordian Knot (2015); The Arts and Emergent Bilingual Youth, (2013): Education, Immigrant Students, Refugee Students, and English Learners (2011), and Teaching English Learners and Immigrant Students in Secondary School Settings (2007). 

He holds an MA degree in Mexican American Graduate Studies from San José State University and an MA in Second Language Education and PhD in Curriculum & Teacher Education with an emphasis in Bilingual Cross-Cultural Education from Stanford University. Professor Faltis is an artist who integrates political art concerning Mexican immigration with educational policy and practices.  His work has been shown in published in multiple venues across the United States

References

Burt, M. K. & Kiparsky, C. (1972) The gooficon: A repair manual for English. Rowley, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Castillo Zaragoza, E. D. (2011) Identity, motivation, and pluralingualism in SACs. In G. Murray, A. Gao and T. Lamb (Eds.). Identity, motivation and autonomy: Exploring their links. Bristol: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Pp. 91-106

Castillo Zaragoza, E. D. (2014) Social class and autonomy: Four case studies in a Mexican SAC. In G. Murray (Ed.). Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Pp. 192-210

Chamot, A. U. & O’Malley, J. M. (1987) The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. In tesol quarterly, 21 (2). Pp 227-249

Domínguez-Gaona, M.; López-Bonilla, G. & Englander, K. (2012) Self-access materials: Their features and their selection in students’ literacy practices. In Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3 (4). Pp. 465-481

Dörnyei, Z. (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ellis, N. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009) Construction a second language: Analyses and computional simulations of the emergence of linguistic structures from usage. In N. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman (Eds.). Language as a complex adaptive system. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 90-125

Gardner, R.C. (1982). Language attitudes and language learning. In E. Boudhard Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.). Attitudes towards language variation. New York: Edward Arnold. Pp. 132-147

Gardner, R. & Lambert, W. (1959) Motivational variables in second language learning. In Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13 (4). Pp. 266-272

Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.). The new psychology of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 155-175

Hurd, S. & Lewis, T. (2008) Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Larsen-Freeman, K. (2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge. Pp. 48-72

Lee, N.; Joaquin, A.; Mates, A. & Shumann, J. (2009) The interactive instinct: The evolution and acquisition of language. London: Oxford University Press.

Murray, G. (ed.). (2014) Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. In Language Learning, 50 (3). Pp. 417-528

O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990)Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. (2011) Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson Longman.

Pennycook, A. (2010) Language as a local practice. New York: Routledge.

Renalli, J. (2012) Alternative models of self-regulation and implications for L2 strategy research. In Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3 (4). Pp. 357-376

Rose, H. (2012) Language learning strategy research: Where do we go from here? In Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3 (2). Pp. 137-148

Rubin, J. (1975) What the “good language learner” can teach us. In tesol Quarterly, 9 (1). Pp. 41–51

Schumann, J. H. (1976) Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. In Language learning, 26 (2). Pp. 391-408

Schumann, J. H. (1986) Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. In Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 7 (5). Pp. 379-392.

Seliger, H. (1977) Does practice make perfect? A study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. In Language Learning 27 (2). Pp. 263-78

Stevick, E. W. (1980) Teaching languages: A way and ways. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.

Tseng, W. T.; Dörnyei, Z. & Schmitt, N. (2006) A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. In Applied Linguistics, 27 (1). Pp. 78-102

Valdés, G.; Capitelli, S. & Alvarez, L. (2010) Latino Children Learning English: Steps in the Journey. New York: Teachers College Press.

Vygotsky, L. (1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.

Woodrow, L. (2005) The challenge of measuring language learning strategies. In Foreign Language Annals, 38 (1). Pp. 90–100

Christian Faltis

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

Faltis, C. (2015). Autonomous Language Learning When Language Is a Social Practice: Implications for Teacher Educators. Verbum Et Lingua: Didáctica, Lengua Y Cultura, (5), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.32870/vel.vi5.44