Ambitransitive verbs, semantic and discursive properties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/vel.vi19.179Keywords:
Ambicalance, Transitivity, Syntactic valency, Semantic-discursive, SyntaxAbstract
The following article deals with ambitransitive properties of Spanish verbs in search of explaining why certain verbs can appear without a direct object. In order to do so, a corpus of 50 verbs was examined, 25 of which were strictly transitive, while the 25-remaining presented ambitransitive properties. With the purpose of substantiating the syntactic valency of our verbs, examples of constructions containing the abovementioned verbs were searched within two Spanish corpus: the Diachronic Spanish Corpus (CORDE, by its acronym in Spanish) and the Current Spanish Reference Corpus (CREA, by its acronym in Spanish). The analysis was made through two theories regarding verbal ambivalence, the constructionist-discursive theory (Cano Aguilar, 1981) and the lexical-semantic proprieties of verbs theory (Levin, 1993). Our study led us to find that verbal ambivalence is not a purely syntactic property but a lexical-semantic phenomenon, which also includes discursive and pragmatic functions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bohrn, Andrea (2010). Verbos transitivos y sus objetos: sobre la posibilidad de omitir Complementos. En IX Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas 27 al 30 de abril de 2010 La Plata, Argentina. El hispanismo ante el bicentenario. Asociación Argentina de Hispanistas.
Campos, Hector (1999) Transitividad e intransitividad. En Bosque, Ignacio/ Demonte, Violeta (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales. (Pp. 1519-1574). Madrid: Espasa.
De Miguel, Elena (1999) “El aspecto léxico”. En Bosque, Ignacio/ Demonte, Violeta (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales. (Pp. 2977-3060). Madrid: Espasa.
Dixon, Robert (2010a), Basic Linguistic Theory Volume 1: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: Oxford.
Dixon, Robert (2010b) Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 2, Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1980) Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 2: 251-299.
Ibáñez, S., & Melis, C. (2016). “Ambivalencia transitiva y estructura argumental: resultados de un estudio de uso”. Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología, 2: 153-198.
Levin, Beth (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago press.
Moreno Cabrera, J.C. (1991), Curso Universitario de Lingüística General Tomo 1: Teoría de la Gramática y Sintaxis General, University Press. España.
Payne, Thomas (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Sandra A. y Paul J. Hopper (2001), Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. En J. L. Bybee y P. J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. (Pp. 27-59). A?msterdam, John Benjamins.
Yasutake, Tomoko (1987) Objectless Transitives in English. The Bulletin of Aichi University of Education, 36: 43-55.
