Dinámicas de género en la reproducción social neoliberal de hogares rurales mexicanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55555/IS.28.584Palabras clave:
Reproducción social, cooperativas, trabajo de cuidados, dinámicas de género, México ruralResumen
Durante el periodo neoliberal la reproducción social de hogares rurales mexicanos intensificó el trabajo de mujeres. Políticas subsidiarias y organización colectiva reforzaron deberes morales sobre el trabajo de cuidados con efectos ambivalentes en relaciones de género dentro y fuera del hogar. La investigación estudió dinámicas de género estimuladas por el Programa Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera (POP) y cooperativas lideradas por mujeres en las cualidades laborales de las mujeres, la asignación de recursos del hogar y la percepción del trabajo de cuidados, en un contexto de emigración. El esquema conceptual analizó la dinámica gemela del género y su performatividad, la economía moral del hogar y el cuidado, la organización alternativa y la (des)obediencia estratégica para identificar conductores de cambio y continuidad en prácticas de género. Desde de un enfoque cualitativo, se examinaron dos estudios de caso para distinguir patrones que (des)estabilizan normas de género respecto del cuidado. Se encontró que, la subversión de normas implicó (des)obediencia estratégica de las madres, el reconocimiento de su trabajo y la promulgación de reciprocidad de esposos expuestos a división del trabajo por género no convencional. Finalmente, la perspectiva visibiliza alternativas colectivas y solidarias para transitar hacia responsabilidad compartida del cuidado.Citas
Acker, Joan. “Hierarchies, Jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations.” Gender and Society 4, no.2 (1990): 139-158. https://www.jstor.org/stable/189609.
Ahmed, Sara. “Interview with Judith Butler.” Sexualities 19, no. 4 (2016): 482-492. Doi: 10.1177/1363460716629607.
Ayala, Maria y Aurelia Murga. “Patriarchy and women’s multidimensional agency: a case study of a Mexican sending village.” Women’s Studies International Forum 59, (2016):1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2016.08.002.
Bakker, Isabella y Rachel Silvey. Beyond the states and markets. The challenges of social reproduction. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
Bakker, Isabella y Stephen Gill, “Rethinking power, production, and social reproduction: Toward variegated social reproduction.” Capital and Class 43, no. 4 (2019): 1-21. Doi: 10.1177/0309816819880783.
Bakker, Isabella. “Social reproduction and the constitution of a gendered political economy.” New Political Economy 12, no. 4 (2007): 541–556. Doi: 10.1080/13563460701661561.
Barragán, Salvador, Mural Erogul y Caroline Essers. “'Strategic (dis)obedience': Female entrepreneurs reflecting on and acting upon patriarchal practices.” Gender, Work & Organization 25, no. 5 (2018):575-592. Doi: 10.1111/gwao.12258.
Berger, Laura, Yvone Benschop y Mariane van den Brink. “Practising gender when networking: The case of university-industry innovation projects.” Gender, Work & Organization 22, no. 6 (2015):556-578. Doi: 10.1111/gwao.12104.
Bergeron, Suzanne. “Economics, performativity, and social reproduction in global development.” Globalizations 8, no. 2 (2011): 151-161. Doi: 10.1080/14747731.2010.493014.
Bradshaw, Sarah, Sylvia Chant y Brian Linneker. “Gender, policy and anti-poverty policy.” En The Routledge handbook of Latin American Development, coords. Julie Cupples, Marcela Palomino-Schalscha y Manuel Prieto, 534-555. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.
Butler, Judith. Undoing gender. Nueva York: Routledge, 2004.
Cecchini, Simone y Aldo Madariaga. Programas de transferencias condicionadas: balance de la experiencia reciente en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: CEPAL, 2011. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/27854.
Chant, Sylvia. “The feminization of poverty and the feminization of anti-poverty programmes: Room for revision?” The Journal of Development Studies 44, no.2 (2008):165-197. Doi:10.1080/00220380701789810.
Charusheela, S. “Engendering feudalism: Modes of production revisited.” Rethinking Marxism 22, no. 3 (2010): 438-445. Doi: 10.1080/08935696.2010.490401
Cheal, David. “The household economy: Reconsidering the domestic mode of production.” En Strategies of resource management in household economies: Moral economy or political economy, ed. Richard Wilk, 11-22. London: Westview Press, 1989.
Cruz-Torres, Maria. “Unruly women and invisible workers: The shrimp traders of Mazatlán, Mexico.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37, no. 3 (2012): 610-617. Doi: 10.1086/662722 610-617.
Daskalaki, Maria. “The subversive potential of witchcraft: A reflection on Federici's self-reproducing movements.” Gender, Work & Organization 28, (2021): 1640-1660. Doi:10.1111/gwao.12654.
E?im, Simel. “Cooperatives.” En The Routledge handbook of Feminist Economics, coords. Günseli Berik y Ebru Kongar, 486-494. New York: Routledge, 2021.
Evans, Alice. “The decline of male breadwinner and persistent of the female career: exposure, interest, and micro- macro interactions.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106, no. 5 (2016):1135-1151. Doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1184557.
Fiszbein, Ariel, Norbert Schady, Francisco Ferreira, Margaret Grosh, Niall Keleher, Pedro Olinto y Emanuel Skoufias. Conditional Cash Transfers. Washington DC: World Bank, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2597.
Fraad, Harriet, Stephen Resnick y Richard Wolff. “For every knight in shining armor, there's a castle waiting to be cleaned: A marxist-feminist analysis of the household.” Rethinking Marxist 2, no. 4 (2009): 9-69. Doi: 10.1080/08935698908657885
Gibson-Graham, J.K., Jenny Cameron y Stephen, Healy. Take back the economy. An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Michigan: The University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
Ginsburg, Faye y Ryana Rapp. “The politics of reproduction.” Annual Review of Anthropology 20 (1991):311-343. Doi:10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523.
Hamilton, Judy. “'Caring/Sharing': Gender and horizontal coordination in the workplace.” Gender, Work & Organization 18, no. S1 (2011): e23-e48. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00468.x
Herrera, Cristina y María Agoff. “Goodbye to the golden cage: Transformation in gender norms and family morality for working-class women in occupations considered masculine in Mexico.” Gender, Work & Organizations 26, no. 9 (2019):1234-1339. Doi: 10.1111/gwao.12342
Katz, Cindi “Vagabond capitalist and the necessity of social reproduction.” Antipode 33, no. 4 (2001):709-728. Doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00207.
Kunz, Rahel. “The crisis of the social reproduction in rural Mexico: Challenging the 'reprivatization of the social reproduction' thesis.” Review of International Political Economy, 17 no. 5 (2010):913-945. Doi: 10.1080/09692291003669644
Levitt, Heidi, Michael Bamberg, John Creswell, David Frost, Ruthellen Josselson, y Carola Suárez-Orozco. “Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.” American Psychologist 73, no. 1 (2018): 26-46. Doi: 10.1037/amp0000151.
Martin, Patricia. “Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity.” Gender, Work & Organization 13, no. 3 (2006): 254-276. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00307.x
Martin, Patricia. “"Said and done" versus "saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work.” Gender & Society, 17 no. 3 (2003): 342-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203017003002
Molyneux, Maxine, Nicola Jones y Fiona Samuels. “Can cash transfer programmes have transformative effects?” The Journal of Development Studies 52, no. 8 (2016): 1087-1098. Doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134781.
Molyneux, Maxine. “Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico's conditional transfer programme.” Social Policy & Administration 40, no. 4 (2006): 425–449. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00497.x
Naylor, Lindsay. “Reframing autonomy in political geography: A feminist geopolitics of autonomous resistance.” Political Geography 58, (2017): 24–35. Doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.01.001.
Parker, Martin, George Cheney, Valerie Fournier y Chris Land. “The question of organization: A manifesto for alternatives.” Ephemera: Theory & politics in organization 14, no. 4 (2014):623-638. https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/705369/1/Parker_et_al_2014.pdf
Peterson, Nicole. “We are daughters of the sea: Strategies, gender, and empowerment in a Mexican women’s cooperative.” The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 19, no. 1 (2014):148-167. Doi: 10.1111/jlca.12064
Radel, Claudia, Birgit Schmook, Nora Haenn y Lisa Green. “The gender dynamics of conditional cash transfer and smallholder farming in Calakmul, Mexico.” Women's Studies International Forum 65 (2017):17-27. Doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2016.06.004
Rai, Shirin, Catherine Hoskyns y Diana Thomas. “Depletion.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16, no. 1 (2013): 86–105. Doi: 10.1080/14616742.2013.789641.
Ramm, Alejandra. “Latin America: A fertile ground for maternalism,” en Motherhood, social policies and women's activism in Latin America, coords. Alejandra Ramm y Jasmine Gideon, 13-37. Londres: Palgrave, 2020.
Rodríguez-Rocha, Vivian. “Social Reproduction Theory: State of the field and new directions in geography.” Geography Compass e12586, (2021): 1-16. Doi:10.1111/gec3.12586.
Sen, Amartya. Gender and cooperative conflicts. Nueva York: World Institute for Development Economics Research, 1987.
Smith-Oka, Vania. “Unintended consequences: Exploring the tensions between development programs and indigenous women in Mexico in the context of reproductive health.” Social Science & Medicine 68 (2009): 2069–2077. Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.026.
Soto-Alarcón, Jozelin y Chizu Sato, “Enacting peasant moral community economies for sustainable livelihoods: A case of women-led cooperatives in rural Mexico.” World Development 115, (2019):120-131. Doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.005.
Stephen, Lynn. “Women’s weaving cooperatives in Oaxaca: An indigenous response to neoliberalism.” Critique of Anthropology 25, no. 3 (2005): 253-178. Doi: 10.1177/0308275X05055215
Tronto, Joan. Who cares? How to reshape a democratic politics. London: Cornell University Press, 2015.
Vargas-Cetina, Gabriela. “Anthropology and cooperatives: From the community paradigm to the ephemeral association in Chiapas, Mexico.” Critique of Anthropology 25, no. 3 (2005): 229-251. doi 10.1177/0308275X05055210;
Yaschine, Liliana. “Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera, veinte años de historia”, en El Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera, a 20 años de su creación, coords. Gonzalo Hernández, Thania de la Garza, Janet Zamudio e Liliana Yaschine, 31-65. México: Coneval, 2019.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Una vez que un trabajo ha sido aprobado para publicación en Intersticios Sociales, cada autor(a) debe firmar la correspondiente cesión de derechos patrimoniales en el formato aprobado por la revista.
Cada autor retiene los derechos morales de su trabajo, y la cesión arriba descrita se entiende únicamente con fines de publicación académica, no lucrativa, por parte de Intersticios Sociales y El Colegio de Jalisco.
