Aging in Place: Exploration and Application of a Qualitative Methodology Strategy

Authors

  • Alejandro Pérez-Duarte Fernández ITESO
  • Maria del Rocio Enríquez Rosas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55555/IS.29.590

Keywords:

aging in place, housing, walkable urban environment, psychemotional health, qualitative research methodology, public walkable space.

Abstract

Studies on aging, housing, and city have gained relevance in the last decades, especially the modality of aging at home, of which today there are several methodological paths, most of them of qualitative order. One of the complexities of its implementation is the documentation of the domestic environment, the daily activities inside and outside the house, as well as the profile of its inhabitant. A methodology focused on the trinomial person-housing-walkable urban environment is described here, based on the principle that they constitute an inseparable and symbiotic unit where autonomy, socialization, psychoemotional health, and selfcare can be promoted. Interviews, photographs, a map of the immediate area, and a schematic architectural plan of the house are recorded in a computerized database, facilitating the collaborative work of a multidisciplinary group of researchers. The methodological process, fine-tuned and applied to 18 case studies, shows the ability to lay the foundation for a deep understanding of the domestic environment from a gerontological perspective. The study process also opens a possible analytical path for future guidelines for resilient housing production at the request of an aging population.

References

Dovey, Kim y Eleck Pafka. “What is walkability? The urban DMA”. Urban Studies 57, núm. 1 (2020): 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727

Hwang, Eunju, Kathleen Parrott y Nancy Brossoie. “Research on Housing for Older Adults: 2001 to 2018”. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 47, núm. 3 (marzo de 2019): 200-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12295

García-Valdez, María Trinidad, Diego Sánchez González y Rosario Roman. “Envejecimiento y estrategias de adaptación a los entornos urbanos desde la gerontología ambiental”. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos 34, núm. 1 (enero-abril de 2019): 101-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.24201/edu.v34i1.1810.

Generalitat Valenciana. “Escalas e instrumentos para la valoración en Atención Domiciliaria”, 2004. https://www.san.gva.es/es/documents/246911/251004/V.3785-2004.pdf (consultando el 1 de febrero de 2022).

Instituto Municipal de Vivienda. “Reglas de operación para el programa de desdoblamiento habitacional”. Guadalajara: Gobierno de Guadalajara, 2020. http://imuvigdl.gob.mx/descargas/banners/multiplica_vivienda.pdf (consultado el 3 de febrero de 2022).

Lawton, Mortimer Powell. “Environmental Change: The Older Person as Initiaton and Responder”. En Trasitions on Aging, editado por Nancy Datan y Nancy Lohmann (Nueva York: Academic Press, 1980).

Lawton, Mortimer Powell y Lucille Nahemow. “Ecology and the aging process”. En The psychology of adult development and aging, editado por Carl Eisdorfer y Mortimer Powell Lawton. Estados Unidos: American Psychological Association, 1973, 619-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/10044-020

Muntañola, Josep. Topogénesis. Barcelona: Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, 2000.

National Institute on Aging. “Walking, talking, and thinking about brain and body health” (24 de mayo de 2017). www.nia.nih.gov/news/walking-talking-and-thinking-about-brain-and-body-health (consultado el 1 de diciembre de 2023).

Phillipson, Chris y Simon Biggs. “Modernity and Identity: Themes and Perspectives in the Study of Older Adults”. Journal of Aging and Identity 3, (1998): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022888621674

Pérez-Duarte Fernández, Alejandro y Bruno Cruz Petit. “Gerohabitación, cohabitación, indeterminación: tres estrategias de proyecto para la tercera edad”. Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura, núm. 16 (mayo de 2017): 74-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/ppa2017.i16.05

Rosenwohl-Mack, Amy, Karen Schumacher, Min-Lin Fang y Yoshimi Fukuoka. “A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies”. International Journal of Nursing Studies 130 (marzo de 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103496

Skinner, Mark, Gavin Andrews y Malcolm Cutchin. “Introducing Geographical Gerontology”. Geographical Gerontology. Estados Unidos: Routledge, 2017, 3-10.

Urbina-Aceves, Emma, Everardo Camacho-Gutiérrez, Alejandro Pérez-Duarte y Luis Silva-Castillo. “Análisis descriptivo de la movilidad, emociones y salud en la referencia verbal de adultos mayores”. Psicología y Salud 34, núm. 1 (2024): 59-70. https://doi.org/10.25009/pys.v34i1.284.

Wiles, Janine L., Ruth E. S. Allen, Anthea J. Palmer, Karen J. Hayman, Sally Keeling y Ngaire Kerse. “Older people and their social spaces: A study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand”. Social Science & Medicine 68, núm. 4 (2009): 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.030

Yi-FU, Tuan. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Estados Unidos: Columbia Univesity Press, 1974.

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

Pérez-Duarte Fernández, Alejandro, and Maria del Rocio Enríquez Rosas. 2024. “Aging in Place: Exploration and Application of a Qualitative Methodology Strategy”. Intersticios Sociales, no. 29 (November):23-44. https://doi.org/10.55555/IS.29.590.

Issue

Section

Social Spaces under Debate