Meaning as lifeworld: indecision in relation to its social dimension in Habermas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55555/IS.21.300Keywords:
contemporary sociological theory, problem of meaning, modernity, social pathologies, theoretical mediations.Abstract
This article analyzes the problem of meaning in the perspective of Habermas based on the concept of lifeworld as it is developed in his key work on sociological theory, The Theory of Communicative Action. This unproblematic background of meaning, as the “condition of possibility” of the social, through its communicative rationalization, becomes “parceled” into culture, society, and personality. Thus, his study involves a series of equivalences and mediations among, for example, types of action, speech acts, and claims to validity. This specific historical form of meaning in modernity points, moreover, to two key processes with pathological characteristics; that is, the “colonization” and the “desertification” of the lifeworld. It is in this context that the article traces Habermas’ theoretical “enigma” concerning the relationship between meaning and its social dimension, and outlines three possible answers to this enigma, which Habermas discusses but does not resolve in his The Theory of Communicative Action: one “culturalist” in nature, one “aesthetic”, and one “legal”.References
Alexander, Jeffrey. “The Parsons revival in German sociology”, Sociological Theory 2 (1984): 394-412.
Alexander, Jeffrey. “El nuevo movimiento teórico”, Estudios sociológicos 17 (1988): 259-307.
Autor, 2017.
Belvedere, Carlos. El dualismo en la teoría social contemporánea. Una crítica fenomenológica (Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2012).
Browne, Craig. Habermas and Giddens on Praxis and Modernity. A constructive comparation (Londres: Anthem Press, 2017).
Chernilo, Daniel. “The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: the theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas”, British Journal of Sociology 53 (2002): 431–449.
Giddens, Anthony. “Reason without revolution? Habermas´s Theory of communicative action”, en Social theory and modern sociology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), 225-252.
Gondon, Ariel. “El debate en torno a la fundamentación del conocimiento en Habermas, y la discusión acerca del saber experto y la participación pública en el campo CTS”, Espacio Abierto 20 (2011): 389-407.
Goode, Luke. Jürgen Habermas. Democracy and the public sphere (Londres: Pluto Press, 2005).
Habermas, Jürgen. Perfiles filosófico-políticos (Madrid: Taurus, 1984 [1980]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Ciencia y técnica como ideología (Madrid: Tecnos. 1984 [1968]).
Habermas, Jürgen. La lógica de las ciencias sociales (Madrid: Tecnos, 1987 [1963-1982]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Teoría de la acción comunicativa: complementos y estudios previos (Madrid: Cátedra, 1989 [1970-1983]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Conocimiento e interés (Madrid: Taurus, 1989 [1968]).
Habermas, Jürgen. “A Reply”, en Communicative action. Essays on Jurgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, eds. Axel Honneth y Hans Joas (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 214-264.
Habermas, Jürgen. Facticidad y Validez. Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de una teoría del discurso (Barcelona: Trotta, 1998 [1992]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Problemas de legitimación en el capitalismo tardío (Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. 1999 [1973]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Tiempo de transiciones (Madrid: Trotta, 2004 [2001]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Entre naturalismo y religión (Barcelona: Paidós, 2006 [2005]).
Habermas, Jürgen. El discurso filosófico de la modernidad (Buenos Aires: Katz, 2008 [1985]).
Habermas, Jürgen. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Tomo I: Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social. Tomo II: Crítica de la razón funcionalista (Madrid: Trotta, 2010 [1981]).
Habermas, Jürgen y Dewes, Peter. Autonomy and solidarity. Interviews with Jürgen Habermas (Londres: Verso, 1992).
Hohendahl, Peter. “The dialectic of enlightenment revisited: Habermas' critique of the Frankfurt School”, New German Critique 35 (1985): 3-26.
Honneth, Axel. “Teoría crítica”, en La teoría social, hoy, eds. Anthony Giddens y Jonathan Turner (Madrid: Alianza, 1990), 445-488.
Joas, Hans. “The unhappy marriage of hermeneutics and functionalism”, en Communicative action. Essays on Jurgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, eds. Axel Honneth y Hans Joas (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 97-118.
Lockwood, David. “Social integration and system integration”, en Explorations in Social Change, eds. George Zollschan y Walter Hirsch (Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1964), 244-257.
López de Lizaga, José Luis. “La ética del discurso y el concepto kantiano de deberes hacia uno mismo”, Estud.filos 38 (2008): 103-120.
Mccarthy, Thomas. La teoría crítica de Jürgen Habermas (Madrid: Tecnos. 1987).
Mccarthy, Thomas. “Complexity and democracy: or the seducements of system theory”, en Communicative action. Essays on Jurgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, eds. Axel Honneth y Hans Joas (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 119–139.
Noguera, José. “La teoría crítica: de Frankfurt a Habermas. Una ‘traducción’ de la teoría de la acción comunicativa a la sociología”, Papers 50 (1996), 133-153.
Philipp, Rita. “La teoría del actuar comunicativo de Jürgen Habermas: un marco para los análisis de las condiciones socializadoras en las sociedades modernas”, Papers 56 (1998): 103-123.
Ritzer, George. “Metatheorizing in sociology”, Sociological Forum 5 (1990): 3-15.
Scribano, Adrián. Estudios sobre teoría social contemporánea: Bhaskar, Bourdieu, Giddens, Habermas y Melucci (Buenos Aires: Ciccus, 2009).
Taylor, Charles. “Language and Society”, en Communicative action. Essays on Jurgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, eds. Axel Honneth y Hans Joas (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 23-35.
White, Stephen. The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice and modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Intersticios Sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice
Once a work has been approved for publication in Intersticios Sociales, each author must sign the corresponding transfer of patrimonial rights on the form approved by the journal.
Each author retains the moral rights to her/his work, and the transfer of rights described above is exclusively for academic –not lucrative– purposes, by Intersticios Sociales and El Colegio de Jalisco.
