Mexico and South Korea: The Participatory Approach in the Field of International Development Cooperation

Authors

  • Sanghee Jung Keimyung University, Dept. of Spanish and Latin American Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v6i18.557

Keywords:

Mexico, South Korea, International Development Cooperation, Participatory approach, Cooperative relationships

Abstract

This research analyzes practical approaches to enhancing the partnership between South Korea and Mexico, by focusing on a participatory approach that is regarded as an important component in development cooperation. In this regard, the objective of this research is to establish a new method of cooperation between South Korea and Mexico, based on a participatory approach newly discussed in the evolving development cooperation system. Finally, based on the participatory approach as a strategy for cooperation between South Korea and Mexico, the research suggested joint training programs to expand existing partnerships in the first stage, joint support to programs promoted by both countries in the framework of bilateral cooperation in the second stage, and further financial support by allocating funding in the third stage. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amexid. (2012). Informe anual de cooperación internacional para el desarrollo. Ciudad de México, México: sre.

——. (2014). Tarjeta de apoyo, cooperación bilateral técnica-científica con Centroamérica. Ciudad de México, México: amexid.

——. (2016). Cooperación internacional para el desarrollo otorgada por México en 2014. Recovered from https://www.gob.mx/amexcid/acciones-y-programas/cuantificacion-de-la-cooperacion-mexicana [Accessed 21/03/2017].

Giz. (2014). Cooperación triangular México-Alemania. [Program Brochure]. México: giz.

Jung, Sang-hee. (2012). La cooperación Sur-Sur entre los países latinoamericanos y Corea del Sur en el contexto de la Ayuda Oficial al Desarrollo. Korean Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 31(3): 293-322. Recovered- from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/node06095897

——. (2013). The South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America: Challenges to Korean oda. Iberoamérica, 15(1): 79-115. Recovered from www.lakis.or.kr/journal/download/

——. (2014). México y Corea del Sur en el marco de la cooperación Sur-Sur y triangular. Revista de Estudios Hispánicos, No. 70. Recovered from 156-187. http://www.papersearch.net/thesis/article.asp?key=3221288

——. (2015). A Reflection on New Actors and oda Modalities in Latin America. The Journal of International Relations, 18(1): 103-122. Recovered from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/node06387637

Koica. (2004). Report on Project for Constructions of Medical Center in Yucatan. Seongnam, Korea: koica.

——. (2013). Understanding International Development Cooperation. Seoul, Korea: Hanul.

——. (2016). Statistics by country. Recovered from http://stat.koica.go.kr/ipm/os/acms/areaEacoEacoGnrlzList.do?lang=en Consulted on 21/03/2017.

Lázaro-Ruther, L., & Peláez-Jara, M. (2015). Exploring International Development Cooperation Funds, International Experiences on Governance and Design of Funds. México df: giz.

Lee, Hyun Jung. (2015). Participatory Development of Ethiopia: Focused on Rural Development Project. International Area Studies Review, 24(1): 115-144. Recovered from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/

Lennie, J., & Tacchi, J. (2013). Evaluating Communication for Development: A framework for social change. New York: Routledge.

López-Aymes, J. F. (2016). Corea y el sistema de cooperación para el desarrollo: La internacionalización del desarrollismo. Miríada, 8(12): 11-51. Recovered from http://p3.usal.edu.ar/index.php/miriada/article/view/3783

Morris, Nancy. (2003). A Comparative Analysis of the Diffusion and Participatory Models in Development Communication. International Communication Association, 13(2): 225-248.

Oda Korea. (2016a). Bilateral oda by Region (2008-2015). Recovered from http://odakorea.go.kr/eng.result.Overview.do Consulted on 21/03/2017.

——. (2016b). Korea’s oda by Type of Aid (2010-2015). Recovered from http://odakorea.go.kr/odapage_2012/T02/L03S0101.jsp Consulted on 21/03/2017.

——. (2016c). Country Partnership Strategy. Recovered from http://odakorea.go.kr/eng.policy.CountryPartnershipStrategy.do Consulted on 21/03/2017.

Oecd dac. (2016a). Development aid at a glance, statistics by region: America. Recovered from http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/documentupload/3%20America%20%20Development%20Aid%20at%20a%20Glance%202016.pdf [15/01/2017].

——. (2016b). Mexico’s Development Co-operation. Recovered from http://www.oecd.org/dac/dac-global-relations/mexicos-development-co-operation. htm [21/03/2017].

Oswald, K., & Ruedin, L. (2012). Empowerment sustainability and phasing out support to empowerment processes. Paris, France: oecd. Recovered from http://www.oecd.org/development/povertyreduction/50158268.pdf

Prado Lallande, J. P. (2014). La cooperación internacional para el desarrollo de México. Un análisis de sus acciones, institucionalización y percepciones. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 59(222): 51-86.

——. (2015). Mexico’s Role in Development Cooperation: Bridging North and South. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University (unu-cpr).

Presidencia de la República. (2013). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013-2018. Ciudad de México. México: Presidencia de la República. Recovered from http://www.sev.gob.mx/educacion-tecnologica/files/2013/05/PND_2013_2018.pdf Consulted on 15/01/2017.

Romero Castilla, Alfredo. (2012). México y la República de Corea: Reflexionesen torno a sus 50 años de historia. México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 1(2): 21-42.

Servaes, J. (2012). Communication for Sustainable Development, Indicators for Impact Assessment in usaid Project “Educational Reform in the Classroom in Guatemala”. Journal of Latin American Communication Research, 2(2): 3-34.

Published

2017-08-21