Independencia y rendición de cuentas en las agencias reguladoras: una aproximación desde los grupos de interés
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/rc.vi4.96Palabras clave:
agencias reguladoras, independencia, rendición de cuentas, grupos de interésResumen
A partir la década de 1990, la mayoría de los gobiernos nacionales han ido incorporando de manera progresiva nuevas políticas regulatorias en diferentes ámbitos económicos y sociales, consagrando así el renovado modelo de “Estado regulador”. Las agencias reguladoras necesitan altos niveles de independencia y diversos mecanismos de rendición de cuentas para separarse de las esferas de los poderes político y privado. Este artículo provee un análisis teórico-conceptual que explica la importancia de la independencia política y la rendición de cuentas ante la sociedad civil y otros actores, como los grupos de interés, en los diversos procesos regulatorios...
Citas
Apaydin, F. y Jordana, J. (2020). Varying power configurations and the accountability of independent regulatory agencies. International Review of Public Policy, 2(3), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.1458
Arras, S. y Beyers, J. (2020). Access to European Union agencies: usual suspects or balanced interest representation in open and closed consultations? Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 836-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12991
Austen-Smith, D. y Wright, J. R. (1994). Counteractive lobbying. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111334
Baldwin, R., Cave, M. y Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C. y Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. y Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: the importance of groups in politics and in political science. Choice Reviews Online, 36(02). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-1204
Bernhagen, P. (2007). The political power of business: structure and information in public policymaking. En Bernhagen, P., The political power of business: structure and information in public policymaking. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932612
Beyers, J. y Arras, S. (2020). Who feeds information to regulators? Stakeholder diversity in European Union regulatory agency consultations. Journal of Public Policy, 40(4), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000126
Bianculli, A. C., Fernández-i-Marín, X. y Jordana, J. (2013). The world of regulatory agencies: institutional varieties and administrative traditions. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, July, 1-26.
Borrás, S., Koutalakis, C. y Wendler, F. (2007). European agencies and input legitimacy: EFSA, EMEA and EPO in the post-delegation phase. Journal of European Integration, 29(5), 583-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701694899
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Braithwaite, J. (2019). The regulatory state? En Goodin, R. E. (ed.), The Oxford hanbook of political science (pp. 104-131). https://doi.org/10.7312/calp94192-011
Caramani, D. (2020). Technocratic representation. En Cotta, M. y Russo, F. (eds), Research handbook on political representation (pp. 135-147). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elg.
Carpenter, D. (2014). Reputation and power: organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDE. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Chaqués-Bonafont, L. (2004). Redes de políticas públicas. Madrid: CIS, Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Chaqués-Bonafont, L. (2020). Parliamentary lobbying. The Palgrave encyclopedia of interest groups. Lobbying and public affairs, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_49-1
Chaqués, L. (2020). Interet groups and political representation. En Cotta, M. y Russo, F. (eds.), Research hanbook on political representation (pp. 301-313). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788977098
Chaqués-Bonafont, L. y Medina, I. (2021). The representation of business interests during the covid-19 pandemic in Spain. Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica, 57, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.57.01
Dahl, R. A. (2006). A preface to democratic theory. Expanden edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dubash, N. K. y Bronwen, M. (2013). The embedded regulatory state: between rules and deals. En Dubash, K. y Bronwen, M. (eds.), The rise of the regulatory state of the south: infraestructure and development in emerging economies (pp. 278-296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dür, A. y De Bièvre, D. (2007). The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000591
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Jordana, J. y Bianculli, A. C. (2015). Varieties of accountability mechanisms in regulatory agencies. En Bianculli, A. C., Fernández-i-Marín, X. y Jordana, J. (eds.), Accountabilitity and regulatory governance (pp. 23-50). London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583
Fraussen, B., Albareda, A. y Braun, C. (2020). Conceptualizing consultation approaches: identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity. Policy Sciences, 53(3), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09382-3
Gilardi, F. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046409
Gilardi, F. (2005). The formal independence of regulators: a comparison of 17 countries and 7 sectors. Swiss Political Science Review, 11(4), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00374.x
Gonenc, R., Maher, M. E. y Nicoletti, G. (2000). The implementation and the effects of regulatory reform: past experience and current issues. SSRN. OECD Economics Department working paper No. 251. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.238213
Gregory, R. (2003). Accountability in modern government. En Peters, G. B. y Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 557-568). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127705
Guardiancich, I. y Guidi, M. (2016). Formal independence of regulatory agencies and varieties of capitalism: a case of institutional complementarity? Regulation and Governance, 10(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12080
Guidi, M. (2015). The impact of independence on regulatory outcomes: the case of EU competition policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(6), 1195-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12280
Hanretty, C. y Koop, C. (2012). Measuring the formal independence of regulatory agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.607357
Hanretty, C. y Koop, C. (2013). Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation and Governance, 7(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x
Hooghe, L. y Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governace. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243.
Jordana, J. (2011). The institutional development of Latin American regulatory state. En Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.732989
Jordana, J., Bianculli, A. C. y Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2015). When accountability meets regulation. En Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), Accountabilitity and regulatory governance (pp. 1-22). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jordana, J. y Levi-Faur, D. (2006). Toward a Latin American regulatory state? The diffusion of autonomous regulatory agencies across countries and sectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(4-6), 335-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690500437212
Juanatey, A. G., Jordana, J., Pérez-Durán, I. y Sancho-Royo, D. (2020). Independence, accountability and responsibilities of quality assurance agencies in higher education: European and Latin American countries compared. European Journal of Higher Education, 0(0), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1850309
Koop, C. (2014). Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability. Public Administration, 92(3), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12058
Koop, C. y College, L. (2014). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: mapping the provisions for mandatory accountability. West European Politics, 25, 125-147.
Levi-Faur, D. (2003). The politics of liberalisation: privatisation and regulation-for-competition in Europe’s and Latin America’s telecoms and electricity industries. European Journal of Political Research, 42(5), 705-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00101
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(March), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371
Lewis, L. W. (2011). Regulatory capture: risks and solutions. En Estache, A. (ed.), Emerging issues in competition, collusion, and regulation of network industries (pp. 147-169). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Maggetti, M. (2007). De facto independence after delegation: a fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x
Maggetti, M. y Papadopoulos, Y. (2016). The principal-agent framework and independent regulatory agencies. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664359
Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
Majone, G. (1996). Temporal consistency and policy credibility: why democracies need non-majoritarian institutions. EUI Working Paper RSC, 96/57, 1-14.
Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00003524
Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425284
Marsh, D. y Lewis, C. (2014). The political power of big business: a response to Bell and Hindmoor. New Political Economy, 19(4), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.829435
Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE) (2017). Creando una cultura de independencia: guía práctica contra influencias indebidas. París: OCDE.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE) (2020). Panorama de las administraciones públicas. América Latina y el Caribe 2020. París: OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/1256b68d-es
Pagliari, S. y Young, K. (2016). The interest ecology of financial regulation: interest group plurality in the design of financial regulatory policies. Socio-Economic Review, 14(2), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv024
Pavón-Mediano, A. (2020). Agencies’ formal independence and credible commitment in the Latin American regulatory state: a comparative analysis of 8 countries and 13 sectors. Regulation and Governance, 14(1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12187
Pérez-Durán, I. (2018). Interest group representation in the formal design of European Union agencies. Regulation and Governance, 12(2), 238-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12150
Querbach, T. y Arndt, C. (2017). Política regulatoria en América Latina: un análisis de la situación actual. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers No. 7. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/politica-regulatoria-en-america-latina_940ec5c6-es
Rose, S. (2012). The regulatory state. En Rosenfeld, M. y Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative consitutional law (671-686). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8
Skanavis, C., Koumouris, G. A. y Petreniti, V. (2005). Public participation mechanisms in environmental disasters. Environmental Management, 35(6), 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0120-z
Thatcher, M. y Sweet, A. S. (2004). The politics of delegation. En Stone-Sweet, A. y Thatcher, M. (eds.), The politics of delegation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005989
Verschuere, B., Verhoest, K., Meyers, F. y Peters, B. G. (2006). Accountability and accountability arrangements in public agencies. En Christensen, T. y Lægreid, P. (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 268-298). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vos, E. (2005). Independence, accountability and transparency of European regulatory agencies. En Geradin, D., Muñoz, R. y Petit, N. (eds.), Regulation through agencies: a new paradigm of European governance (pp. 120-137). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wonka, A. y Rittberger, B. (2010). Credibility complexity and uncertainty explaining the institutional independence of 29 EU agencies. West European Politics, 33(4), 730-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238100379459
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 RC RENDICION DE CUENTAS
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
